Roberto Caso, The academic copyright in the age of commodification of scientific research, in SCIRES-IT – SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology, Volume 10, Special Issue (2020) Open Science: New models of scientific communication and research evaluation, Issue edited by P. Gargiulo and Editors in-Chief V. Valzano and M. Cigola

Abstract

There is a large stream of literature related to academic copyright. Nonetheless, a comprehensive interdisciplinary analysis of the interplay between economic rights and moral right of paternity appears to be missing. Furthermore, the impact of commodification of research on academic copyright has not been sufficiently investigated. The basic thesis of this article is that academic copyright with reference to academic texts is currently going through a distortion that alters its nature and functions. This distortion is one of the effects of commodification of scientific research. This paper dwells on these aspects with a focus on the role of modern science and the context in which research is performed and highlights the perverse effects of the current evaluation system based on metrics and numbers and the scientific publishing system dominated by an oligopoly of information and analytics providers. Open Science can represent a tool to defend independence of science and academic freedom, though strong actions are required to change the current situation.

Keywords

Academic copyright, Intellectual Property, Evaluation of Science, Open Science

Full Text:

PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v10Sp25

Pagina in costruzione

Informazioni qui e qui

Introduzione

Il metodo casistico-problematico

L’approccio di diritto e tecnologia

Teorie generali sulla proprietà intellettuale

Teorie generali sul diritto d’autore

Creatività

Dicotomia tra idea ed espressione

I diritti economici

I diritti morali

Il plagio-contraffazione

Il risarcimento del danno

Pagina in costruzione

Informazioni qui e qui

Bibliografia essenziale sulla proprietà intellettuale e sul diritto d’autore

Introduzione

Il metodo casistico-problematico

L’approccio di diritto e tecnologia

La proprietà intellettuale: teorie generali

Il diritto d’autore

Il brevetto per invenzione

I disegni e modelli

I marchi

Le indicazioni geografiche

I nomi di dominio

Il segreto industriale

Berkeley Library – University of California

Glam3D.org

Museo Egizio di Torino: collezione papiri

Angelopoulos C., On Online Platforms and the Commission’s New Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (January 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2947800 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2947800

Berti C., TUTELA DEI CONTENUTI EDITORIALI ON LINE E PROBLEMI DI ENFORCEMENT, Responsabilità Civile e Previdenza, fasc.6, 1 GIUGNO 2019, pag. 2063

Caso R., Il conflitto tra diritto d’autore e ricerca scientifica nella disciplina del text and data mining della direttiva sul mercato unico digitale, Trento LawTech Research Paper, nr. 38, febbraio 2020

Colangelo G., Analisi economica e proprietà intel- lettuale: il caso della riforma europea del diritto d’autore, in F. Di Ciommo, O. Troiano (curr.), Giurisprudenza e autorità indipendenti nell’epoca del diritto liquido. Studi in onore di Roberto Pardolesi, Piacenza, La Tribuna, 2018, 797, 825

Ducato R., Strowel A., Limitations to Text and Data Mining and Consumer Empow- erment: Making the Case for a Right to “Machine Legibility”, in IIC (2019) 50, 649

European Copyright Society (ECS), Comment of the European Copyright Society on Selected Aspects of Implementing Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market Into National Law prepared by Axel Metzger and Martin Senftleben, 27 April 2020

European Copyright Society (ECS), Comment of the European Copyright Society on the Implementationof Art.14 of the Directive(EU) 2019/790on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, 26 April 2020

Falce V., Direttiva Copyright 2019: fair use ed eccezioni al copyright tra esigenze di «apertura» e necessità di indirizzo, https://www.filodiritto.com/direttiva-copyright-2019-fair-use-ed-eccezioni-al-copyright-tra-esigenze-di-apertura-e-necessita-di-indirizzo

Freeland A., Negotiating Under the New EU Copyright Directive 2019/790 and GDPR (March 2020). CURRENTS: Journal of International Economic Law, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3573605 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3573605

Frosio G., Reforming the C-DSM Reform: A User-Based Copyright Theory for Commonplace Creativity (November 7, 2019). INT’L REV INTELL. PROP. AND COMP. (IIC) (Forthcoming March 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3482523 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3482523

Geiger, Christophe and Frosio, Giancarlo and Bulayenko, Oleksandr, The Exception for Text and Data Mining (TDM) in the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – Legal Aspects (March 2, 2018). Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper No. 2018-02. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3160586 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160586

Ghidini G. e Banterle F., A critical view on the european commission’s proposal for a directive on copyright in the digital single market, Giur. comm., 2018, I, 921

Guarda P., Intellectual property rights and barriers to EU citizens: copy- right in the light of the Digital Single Market, in S. de Vries, E. Ioriatti, P. Guarda, E. Pulice (eds.), EU Citizens’ Economic Rights in Action Re-Thinking Legal and Factual Barriers in the Internal Market, Cheltenham, UK-Northampton, MA, USA, Edward El- gar, 2018, 94

Hugenholtz B., The New Copyright Directive: Text and Data Mining (Articles 3 and 4), in Kluwer Copyright Blog, July 24 2019, http://copy- rightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/07/24/the-new-copyright-directive-text-and- data-mining-articles-3-and-4/

Keller P., Article 17 stakeholder dialogue: What we have learned so far – Part 2, January 14, 2020

Keller P., Article 17 stakeholder dialogue: What we have learned so far – Part 1, January 13, 2020

Leistner, Matthias, European Copyright Licensing and Infringement Liability Under Art. 17 DSM-Directive Compared to Secondary Liability of Content Platforms in the U.S. – Can We Make the New European System a Global Opportunity Instead of a Local Challenge? (May 4, 2020). 2020 Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal (ZGE/IPJ), forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=

Metzger, Axel and Senftleben, Martin and Derclaye, Estelle and Dreier, Thomas and Geiger, Christophe and Griffiths, Jonathan and Hilty, Reto and Hugenholtz, P. Bernt and Riis, Thomas and Rognstad, Ole Andreas and Strowel, Alain M. and Synodinou, Tatiana and Xalabarder, Raquel, Selected Aspects of Implementing Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market into National Law – Comment of the European Copyright Society (April 27, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=

Pievatolo M.C., L’età del privilegio. Il diritto d’autore nel mercato unico digitale eu- ropeo, 2019, https://archiviomarini.sp.unipi.it/826/

Quintais J., Frosio G., Gompel van S., Hugenholtz P.B., Husovec M., Jütte B.J., Senftleben M., Safeguarding User Freedoms in Implementing Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive: Recommendations From European Academics (November 11, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3484968 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484968

Quintais J., The New Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive: A Critical Look (October 14, 2019), in European Intellectual Property Review, 2020(1) (Forthcom- ing),
SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3424770 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.34 24770

Riccio, Giovanni Maria, Ancillary Copyright and Liability of Intermediaries in the EU Directive Proposal on Copyright (March 1, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3149363 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3149363

Samuelson P., The EU’s Controversial Digital Single Market Directive, in Communication of the ACM, November 2018, Vol. 61, No. 11, 20

Senftleben M., Bermuda Triangle – Licensing, Filtering and Privileging User-Gener- ated Content Under the New Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, 2019 https://papers.ssrn.co/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3367219

Ruotolo G.M., A Season in the Abyss. Il nuovo copyright UE tra libertà di informa- zione, diritti fondamentali e mercato unico digitale, in Il diritto dell’Unione Europea, 2019, 367

Spitz B., Press Publishers’ Right: the French Competition Authority orders Google to negotiate with the publishers, April 14, 2020

Stalla-Bourdillon, Sophie and Rosati, Eleonora and Turk, Karmen and Angelopoulos, Christina and Kuczerawy, Aleksandra and Peguera, Miquel and Husovec, Martin, A Brief Exegesis of the Proposed Copyright Directive (November 24, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2875296 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2875296

Pagina Web del Senato

AISA

ANAI

Creative Commons Italia

Communia – Linee guida (trad. it.)

ICOM

Wikimedia Italia

Aliprandi S., Vincoli alla riproduzione dei beni culturali, oltre la proprietà intellettuale, Archeologia e CalcolatoriSupplemento 9, 2017, 93-110

Benhamou Y., Revised Report on Copyright Practices and Challenges of Museums (November 16, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3449290 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3449290

Brown M. A., Crews K. D., Control of Museum Art Images: The Reach and Limits of Copyright and Licensing (January 20, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1542070 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1542070

Coad, Samuel, Digitisation, Copyright and the GLAM Sector: Constructing a Fit-For-Purpose Safe Harbour Regime (September 6, 2019). (2019) 50 VUWLR 1; Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper, Student/Alumni Paper No. 13/2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3449037

Crews K.D., Museum Policies and Art Images: Conflicting Objectives and Copyright Overreaching (July 1, 2012). Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 22, p. 795, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2120210

Cronin C., Possession is 99% of the Law: 3D Printing, Public Domain Cultural Artifacts & Copyright (March 8, 2016). USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 16-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2731935 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2731935

De Meo R., A RIPRODUZIONE DIGITALE DELLE OPERE MUSEALI FRA VALORIZZAZIONE CULTURALE ED ECONOMICA, Diritto dell’Informazione e dell’Informatica (Il), fasc.3, 1 GIUGNO 2019, pag. 669

Finocchiaro G., La valorizzazione delle opere d’arte on-line e in particolare la diffusione on-line di fotografie di opere d’arte. Profili giuridici, Aedon, nr.2/2009

Forte P., Il bene culturale pubblico digitalizzato. Note per uno studio giuridico, in P.A. Persona e Amministrazione, nr. 2/2019

Hansen D.R., Copyright Reform Principles for Libraries, Archives, and Other Memory Institutions (July 14, 2014). Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Forthcoming, Vol. 29, 1559, 2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2466091

Hirtle P., Hudson E., Kenyon A. T., Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for Digitization for U.S. Libraries, Archives, and Museums (October 27, 2009). Peter B. Hirtle, Emily Hudson, and Andrew T. Kenyon, COPYRIGHT AND CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS: GUIDELINES FOR DIGITIZATION FOR U.S. LIBRARIES, ARCHIVES, AND MUSEUMS, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Library Press, Forthcoming ; U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 434. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1495365

Keller P., Margoni T., Rybicka K., Tarkowski A., Re-Use of Public Sector Information in Cultural Heritage Institutions (November 4, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2519075 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2519075

LIBEREUROPE, Limitations and Exceptions in EU Copyright Law
for Libraries, Educationalnand Research Establishments: A Basic Guide, 2016

Lis-Gutiérrez, Jenny-Paola, Gestión De La Propiedad Intelectual En Museos (Management of Intellectual Property in Museums) (November 27, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2696054 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2696054

Magnani P., LA PROTEZONE DEI MARCHI DEL MUSEO TRA TUTELA DEI SEGNI DISTINTIVI E SFRUTTAMENTO DELLA NOTORIETÀ, Rivista di Diritto Industriale, fasc.4-5, 1 OTTOBRE 2017, pag. 153

Magnani P., MUSEI E VALORIZZAZIONE DELLE COLLEZIONI: QUESTIONI APERTE IN TEMA DI SFRUTTAMENTO DEI DIRITTI DI PROPRIETÀ INTELLETTUALE SULLE IMMAGINI DELLE OPERE, Rivista di Diritto Industriale, fasc.6, 2016, pag. 211

Manfredi G., La tutela proprietaria dell’immateriale nei beni culturali, in Il diritto dell’economia, vol. 30, nr. 92 (1-2017), 92-93

Marciano A., Moureau N., Museums, Property Rights, and Photographs of Works of Art. Why Reproduction Through Photograph Should Be Free (August 1, 2016). Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 2016, 13(1), 1-28. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2840305

Modolo M., PROMOZIONE DEL PUBBLICO DOMINIO E RIUSO DELL’IMMAGINE DEL BENE CULTURALE, in Archeologia e calcolatori, 2018

Modolo M., (2017). Il dibattito sulla liberalizzazione della fotografia digitale in archivi e biblioteche quattro anni dopo l’appello di Reti Medievali. Reti Medievali Rivista, 18(1), 13-38. https://doi.org/10.6092/1593-2214/5066

Modolo M., Tumicelli, Una possibile riforma sulla riproduzione dei beni bibliografici ed archivistici, Aedon, 1/2016, gennaio-aprile

Montagnani, Maria Lillà and Zoboli, Laura, The Making of an ‘Orphan’: Cultural Heritage Digitisation in the EU (March 30, 2016). International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Oxford University Press, Volume 25, Issue 3, Autumn 2017, 196. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2757245 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2757245

Panezi A., Europe’s New Renaissance: New Policies and Rules for Digital Preservation and Access To European Cultural Heritage (November 26, 2018). Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 24, No. 3, 596, 2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3338179

Reese R.A., Preserving the Unpublished Public Domain (2010). WORKING WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: INNOVATION POLICY FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, edited by Rochelle C. Dreyfuss, Harry First, & Diane L. Zimmerman, Oxford University Press 2010, Chapter 3; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-57. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2082109

Reese R.A., Photographs of Public Domain Paintings: How, If at All, Should We Protect Them? (2009). Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 34, No.4, 2009; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-53. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2070831

Resta G., La privatizzazione del patrimonio culturale nell’era digitale, in Parolechiave, 1/2013, gennaio-giugno

Resta G., Il regime giuridico dell’immagine dei beni, Treccani, 2013

Resta G., Chi è proprietario delle Piramidi? L’immagine dei beni tra property e commons, in Politca del diritto, 4/2009, dicembre

Rimmer M., 3D Printing Jurassic Park: Copyright Law, Cultural Institutions, and Makerspaces (December 18, 2016). Pandora’s Box, 1-12. . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2887167

Sater S., Wright R., A Conversation on Art, Museums, and Blockchain (June 19, 2019). Tulne Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, Vol. 21, No. 35, 2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3406841

Sbarbaro, CODICE DEI BENI CULTURALI E DIRITTO D’AUTORE: RECENTI EVOLUZIONI NELLA VALORIZZAZIONE E NELLA FRUIZIONE DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURALE, Rivista di Diritto Industriale, fasc.2, 2016, pag. 63

Shaver, Lea Bishop, The Right to Science: Ensuring that Everyone Benefits from Scientific and Technological Progress (February 12, 2015). Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Research Paper No. 2015-5. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2564222 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2564222

Shaver, Lea Bishop, The Right to Science and Culture (March 6, 2009). Wisconsin Law Review 2010, no. 1 121-184 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1354788 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1354788

Shaver, Lea Bishop and Sganga, Caterina, The Right to Take Part in Cultural Life: On Copyright and Human Rights (July 21, 2009). Wisconsin International Law Journal 27 (2010): 637-662. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1437319

Stabile S., La tutela e la conservazione degli Archivi Futuristi nel diritto d’autore, Dir. Industriale, 2003, 5, 477

Stabile S., Beni culturali e proprietà intellettuale dei musei: nuovi scenari, Dir. Industriale, 2002, 3, 299

Townsend Gard, Elizabeth, Creating a Last Twenty (L20) Collection: Implementing Section 108(h) in Libraries, Archives and Museums (October 2, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3049158 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3049158

Tumicelli A., L’immagine del bene culturale, Aedon, nr. 1/2014

WIPO REVISED REPORT ON COPYRIGHT PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES OF MUSEUMS prepared by Dr. Yaniv Benhamou, 2019

WIPO Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Libraries and Archives prepared by Kenneth Crews, J.D, Ph.D, Attorney at Law, 2017

WIPO Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for the Visually Impaired prepared by Judith Sullivan, Consultant on Copyright and Public Affairs, 2007

WIPO Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Educational Activities in North America, Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia and Israel prepared by Professor Raquel Xalabarder, Chair of Intellectual Property at the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona